Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 07:28

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Can AI replace architects and interior designers?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
NBA Finals Game 7 traffic: No one allowed to drive into Bricktown after game, says PD - News 9
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Blue Diamond to close historic midtown Sacramento plant; 600 jobs affected - Sacramento Bee
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
The fate of the EV tax credits depends on the GOP’s megabill - NPR
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Study Reveals Plague's Evolutionary Hack to Survive 3 Pandemics - ScienceAlert
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
$10,000 2-year CD accounts: Here's why they're worth opening now - CBS News
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Jennifer Garner smooches boyfriend John Miller at charity event in rare PDA moment - Page Six
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.